Article by the American Pharmacist Association

“For the first time in 3 years, the CMS regulatory agenda released a Medicare Advantage and Part D proposed rule. The Part D proposed rule is a platform for presenting major policy changes for public comment.

To view a CMS fact sheet on all the proposed rules, visit http://apha.us/2itZYRh.

Clarifying ‘any willing pharmacy’ participation

One of the sections of the new proposed rule intends “to clarify that the any willing pharmacy requirement applies to all pharmacies, regardless of how they have organized one or more lines of pharmacy business.” Currently, some Medicare drug plans drive patients towards “preferred” pharmacies, or charge patients higher copays at pharmacies that aren’t “preferred” but may, for example, be more geographically convenient, provide services beyond traditional services, or where they have established relationships with pharmacists. Under the current framework, not all pharmacies may become a “preferred” pharmacy, even if willing to meet a plan’s requirements, because they may not satisfy the plan’s definition of a certain type of pharmacy. Pharmacy groups have long advocated for inclusion of “any willing pharmacy” provisions that allow patients to use any pharmacy that agrees to accept a plan’s conditions. The proposed rule clarifies that Part D plan sponsors may not exclude pharmacies with unique or innovative care delivery models from participating on the basis of not fitting the correct pharmacy type classification. Rather, under the proposed rule, CMS will consider “similarly situated” pharmacies include any pharmacy that has the capability of complying with standard terms and conditions for a pharmacy type.

Drug management programs

Another section of the proposed rule “includes a Request for Information soliciting comment on potential policy approaches for applying some manufacturer rebates and all pharmacy price concessions to the price of a drug at the point of sale,” which would affect direct and indirect renumeration (DIR) fees that claw back pharmacy reimbursements weeks or months after a drug is dispensed. In addition, CMS is soliciting comments on how to effectively design a policy requiring Part D plans to share savings from the rebates they receive with beneficiaries in order to mitigate the effects of DIR fees on costs to both patients and Medicare.”

Click here to continue reading this article.

Enjoy our blog post? Subscribe!

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the latest news from our team. Learn more about the people behind the prescription, latest events, newest client programs, industry resources, and much more.

Thank you! Please check your email to confirm your subscription and watch for info from us soon!